Austria     Belgium     Brazil     Canada     Denmark     Finland     France     Germany     Hungary     Iceland     Ireland     Italy     Luxembourg     The Netherlands     Norway     Poland     Spain     Sweden     Switzerland     UK     USA     

Europe’s Power Is Shifting East

For three decades, Eastern Europe functioned as one of globalization’s most important assembly workshops. German carmakers, Western European suppliers and multinational production chains relied on the region’s cheaper labor and favorable cost base. Today, however, a much more unexpected transformation is underway. In a certain sense, the continent’s economic center of gravity is shifting east again; not because of the automotive industry, battery production or the technology sector, but because of the defense industry. The return of war to Europe has triggered an industrial renaissance that could fundamentally reshape the region’s economic role over the next decade.

One of the basic assumptions of post-Cold War Europe was that the continent would gradually leave geopolitics behind. In an age of economic integration, globalization and cheap energy, many believed that the importance of military capacity would steadily decline. Eastern Europe’s development model was built on the same logic. After joining the EU, Poland, Czechia, Slovakia, Hungary and Romania gradually became integrated into the Western European industrial system. The region’s success was based on increasing productivity, attracting foreign investment and export-oriented manufacturing. Few analysts would have predicted twenty years ago that by the mid-2020s, one of Europe’s most dynamically growing industries would once again be weapons production.

Yet that is exactly what is happening. The war in Ukraine was not only a security-policy shock, but also an economic turning point. European governments realized that the continent’s defense capacities fall far short of what a prolonged conflict requires. Over the past decades, most countries optimized their armies and industries for peacetime. Stockpiles were minimal, production lines operated with limited capacity, and in many places the defense industry had shrunk into a marginal sector. The war showed that modern conflicts require not only soldiers, but enormous volumes of industrial production: ammunition, missiles, armored vehicles, electronic systems and components. Europe suddenly realized that it could produce far less of these than it needed.

In this situation, Eastern Europe gained an unexpected advantage. The region still has industrial traditions and production capacities that have disappeared across large parts of Western Europe. In the cases of Poland, Czechia and Slovakia, defense-industrial know-how never fully vanished; it merely receded into the background. Now it has regained strategic importance. Poland, for example, has launched one of Europe’s largest defense investment programs in just a few years, while new factories, logistics centers and supplier networks are being built across the region. This process is not simply military modernization. It is also an industrial-policy project.

The story, however, is much more interesting than the production of more tanks or more ammunition. What we are really seeing is the birth of a new economic identity. For a long time, Eastern Europe functioned as the periphery of globalization. It was important, but rarely strategically indispensable. The region’s role was fundamentally built on cost advantage. Now, for the first time since the fall of communism, some countries are becoming important not because they are cheaper, but because they have become geopolitically central. That is a fundamentally different position. Strategic importance can bring higher wages, larger state investment, more advanced technological capacities and longer-term political attention.

The process also points to deeper cultural changes. Eastern Europe in the 2000s was a story of Westernization. The region’s societies tried to catch up with the logic of consumer capitalism, integration and peace. Eastern Europe in the second half of the 2020s, however, finds itself in a world where geopolitics has again become a decisive factor. The rise of the defense industry is a symbol of this. The role of the state is increasing again. Industrial policy is returning. The concept of strategic self-sufficiency is acquiring new meaning. The idea that the market alone can solve every problem looks less and less convincing.

Perhaps this is the most interesting part of the story. After the Cold War, many believed that Europe had entered a post-historical era in which economics would matter more than geopolitics. Now the opposite is happening. Geopolitics is reshaping the economy. And one of the biggest beneficiaries may be precisely the region that was long treated as Europe’s periphery.

The question is no longer whether Eastern Europe is part of the continent’s economic system. It is. The question is whether, over the next decade, the region will remain a simple manufacturing base or become a strategic center in a Europe that is beginning to think again in the language of security, sovereignty and industrial capacity. If it does, the 2020s may be remembered in Eastern Europe not for the AI revolution or the energy crisis, but because this was when the region’s place on Europe’s economic map changed permanently.